Category Archives: Ink Spatterings

I Yelled at a Bird

On Writing While Having Ears


Simple graphic with a cartoon woodpecker on the left, facing right. To the right of the bird, the title reads ‘I Yelled at a Bird’ in large black letters. Below it, the subtitle says ‘On Writing While Having Ears.’ At the bottom left, in smaller gray text, it says ‘by Jackie Pick.’ The background is white and uncluttered

The other morning, I yelled at a bird. He was pecking at the side of my house right outside my office like he was trying to Morse-code Infinite Jest into the drywall.

In his defense, that’s his job. He’s a woodpecker. Nominative determinism at its most bloggable.

In my defense, I was attempting to write. That’s (allegedly) my job. Writing requires concentration, intention, structure, and little-to-no bird drama.

Inspired by Maya Angelou, I woke early to try to be one of those Excellent Writers™ who catch the Be-Brilliant-Doing-The-Writing-Thing motes that supposedly float through the dawn.

Well, I woke up early. The “Be-Brilliant-Doing-The-Writing-Thing” is more Dr. Angelou’s domain.

Early morning, it turns out, is when my brain picks at itself then presents a show called Every Mistake I’ve Ever Made and Also Let’s Workshop Future Ones! There are musical numbers and everything.

An imperfect start to the day, but at least it’s terrible.

I do not write first thing, although I get organized. Coffee focuses me enough to craft a to-do list. Then I’m organized and stressed. This counts as multitasking.

These last few weeks, the woodpecker has been clocking in by 7:00 a.m. I call him The Contractor. I should call him Sir Aneurysm Incoming.

As a writer (allegedly), I’m supposed to observe the delicate, shimmering miracle of existence. And I want to. I try to. It’s hard to notice anything other than the bird face-hammering my office wall into dust.

The household wakes.

There is one rule to getting teenagers out the door: engage only when summoned. It’s best not to care out loud. But I do. Catastrophically. Usually by saying “good morning.”

You can count the syllables in their sighs.

There are daily logistics to coordinate with my husband: forms, appointments, who is attending to which child where, who is giving the dishwasher emotional support, and …wait, we’re out of ketchup?

Before my workday starts, I’ve absorbed everyone’s emotions because my empathy is an open-concept floor plan. Add to that the simmering impatience of the man in the Subaru behind us who believes my insufficient acceleration jeopardizes the spirit of American progress. I fear he will tailgate one or both of us directly into another dimension.

Sir, I am driving a practical mid-size SUV, and I am doing my best.

I do not want to ruin his day until he honks.

Finally, I sit to write. Whither my Muse?

My Muse is draped across the couch, wearing my robe and eating pastries. “You’ve got this,” she says, waving strudel in my general direction.

This is unhelpful.

At its core, writing is solving one small problem only to discover it was guarding a nest of larger, slipperier ones tangled in a Gordian knot of plot and character and the ability to put words in some kind of order.

It is noble, irritating labor.

I can do noble, irritating labor. Muse-less, even.

Tap. Tap. Taptaptaptap.

Just as I consider offering the woodpecker a co-writing credit if he’d please shut up, my neighbor steps into his backyard to practice trumpet. Backyard trumpet. Right by my office.

Then someone revs a car engine like they’re summoning the ghost of Vin Diesel (who, it should be noted, is not dead).

This does not deter the woodpecker. He is a professional. He should take up writing.

I’ve read the Internet. It says that if I were truly committed to my craft, I would simply not hear all the noise.

Yes. Thank you. I hadn’t considered the bold strategy of not having ears.

Look, distraction is not always avoidance. Sometimes attention goes to the loud thing because the thing is loud.

The world is committed to being loud. I am committed to being a Good Enough Writer™ who li — aaaand now leafblowers are forming some sort of demented quartet with the backyard trumpet-noodling neighbor.

Taptaptaptap.

I opened the window.

“Bird! Stop!”

Quiet.

It felt good. I added “Deal with woodpecker” to my to-do list, then crossed it off.

Except…

I yelled at a bird.

This doesn’t make me feel observant of the delicate, shimmering miracle of existence.

It makes me feel like an asshole. The sort of asshole whose command of language evaporates under pressure, leaving me with nothing but “Bird! Stop!”

I wandered over to the couch for reassurance from my Muse. She shook an empty bag of kettle chips at me, wanting a refill.

Tap. Tap. Taptaptaptap.

That bird’s Muse is clearly better than mine.

A Modest Proposal for the Preservation of Civilization by Means of Group Chats

Encompassing but not limited to text chains, Messenger threads, WhatsApp dramas, Facebook comment kerfuffles, and similar circles of digital grievance.

It is a melancholy object, to those who dare attempt discourse, when they find conversations derailed by nuance, muddied with civility, or — ye gods! — conducted in person. Face-to-face conversations are notoriously unreliable, as they often involve people saying things that sound suspiciously like what they mean.

In this smoldering age, politicians argue, institutions creak, and somewhere, someone is inventing a new kind of paperwork.

I think it is agreed by all sensible parties (and at least three committees who have been trying to adjourn since 2006) that the sheer multiplicity of human communication is a public menace. Who amongst us has not endured the inefficiency of speech, the peril of eye contact, or the muppety flapping of arms to emphasize a point? No politician, pundit, or professor can preserve us.

Therefore, I modestly propose (usually preferable to immodestly proposing) that the group chat be the model and indeed the mechanism by which all of society is preserved. All communication, be it domestic, political, or sextual, should be confined henceforth to group texts, Facebook comment threads, and other online bitching arenas. All comments can be observed, recorded, and weaponized as needed. I propose these places not because they’re good, but because they’re reliably bad, which these days is the closest thing we have to safe.

We have already seen its power. A PTA chat of fifteen mothers and one father who replies “sounds good” can coordinate massive amounts of allergen-free snacks with more efficiency than the Pentagon deploys aircraft. A college roommate chat can process four marriages, two divorces, and one regrettable tattoo with fewer delays than family court. A midnight “you up?” has sparked (and derailed) more talks than Geneva.

By my best calculations, a group text of six to thirty-seven people, on a topic of no importance or clarity, can continue for weeks without resolution yet with feigned enthusiasm, thus bonding the community like poorly-set epoxy. Likewise, a Facebook thread can be expected to produce on average 142 comments: 118 bad-faith accusations, 17 GIFs, and 7 people sincerely attempting to help. They will be ignored. Surely these numbers demonstrate the efficiency of the system. Surely, also they demonstrate the futility of resistance.

Also, I posit with the mathematical certainty of one who regularly zoned out in algebra class, that for every one thousand “k” reactions, at least five international conflicts may be prevented. Gross domestic happiness would increase by twelve percent.

Of course, rules must be clear: no muting, no leaving, no sneaking off to Buffalo Wild Wings for in-person jibber jabber. Every meme circulated thrice shall acquire the force of law.

Should anyone run afoul of these rules, the penalty shall be immediate banishment to an uncomfortably governmental Signal chat.

Some will cry out that this proposal reduces sincerity, nuance, and basic human decency. To which I reply with all possible graciousness: obviously. Have you met people? And have we not already reduced all discourse to bloviating, grievances, and emojis? I merely propose a proper filing system.

Others may object in favor of email, to which I say: That way lies madness. Group texts are the last good ship on the sea, and if we are to survive, we had better climb aboard. (Also, just admit it: your Gmail is a Mausoleum of the Unread.)

A third objection may be raised, that conversation face-to-face is preferable. This, in theory, I cannot deny; yet in practice, it has already ruined civilization, whereas the group text has not yet had the opportunity.

I profess sincerely that I have no personal stake in this. I have been ejected from three group chats, ignored in countless threads, and endured the indignity of someone attempting to mute me in person with a TV remote. My only motive is the preservation of civilization by its last remaining instrument: the perpetual ding of notification

A Meeting of the Mind 2

Sequels Are Always Better Than the Original, Right?


ME: Good morning, Every Part of My Brain. Welcome to this second and highly improbable gathering of the committee. Let’s welcome Dragon to the team. He gnaws on my free time like chicken bones.

DRAGON: Cease! There’s no time for kissing up.

ME: We’re going to skip the icebreakers. We all know each other, as last month’s axe-throwing social made painfully clear.

(cheers erupt as Hype Man roars and grinningly points to a massive scar on his forehead. )

ME: Here are the minutes from the last meeting, which I’ve canonized as “classic literature.”

CRITIC: So it’s achieved the distinguished state of being largely unread?

HYPE MAN: YEAH! Minutes! The sizzle reel!

ME: Right. Brilliant. Perfect start. (clears throat) Time is like a soufflé: delicate, prone to collapse, and –

DRAGON: – guarded by me.

MONKEY BRAIN: I call this meeting to chaos! All in favor?

ME: Hands down. FYI, this meeting was pushed to the 3rd quarter because –

MARKETER: – because I double-booked us with a webinar on “Optimizing Your Creative Brand in Twelve Excruciating but Photogenic Steps.”

DRAGON: (snorts a puff of smoke like an offended kettle) Pathetic.

ME: Next, Old Business.

ARCHIVIST: Every Business eventually turns into Old Business.

DREAMER: New Business is just Old Business we haven’t met yet.

CRITIC: Our Old Business hangs around like a bad smell, because none of you actually take care of anything. Except, you, Me.

(MONKEY BRAIN flings unwrapped Tootsie Rolls at everyone. Snacking ensues.)

ME: (bangs gavel) Yes, very good. Moving on. I’d like to discuss role consolidation. I propose merging Critic, Worrier, and Self-Doubter into one tidy Efficiency Pod.

CRITIC: Absolutely not.

SELF-DOUBTER: I don’t think I’m pod material.

WORRIER: I’m not pod-shaped.

ME: Fine. Separate disasters you shall remain. Please fill out your timecards accordingly.

DRAGON: You people waste time like it’s your job.

ME: Can we please talk about writing?

Archivist: Ah. The novel. How goes it?

CRITIC: Probably like an axe to the skull, right, Hype Man?

HYPE MAN: Uncool, but still, high-five!

ME: It, I am happy to say, goes well.

DREAMER: (rolling in a corkboard) I took the liberty of creating a Vision Board of our progress. Behold: a vaping dolphin, a typewriter made of ice cream, and Keanu Reeves in velvet singing Elizabethan madrigals.

ME: What on earth?

CRITIC: That’s not a vision board. That’s a cry for help.

HYPE MAN: Love it! Everyone should vape out of their blowhole!

MONKEY: BLOWHOLE

WORRIER: Is Keanu singing madrigals, or is it the velvet jacket?

ARCHIVIST: Actually, that’s corduroy, not velvet.

ME: Let’s all stop –

WORRIER: Stop writing?

ME: What? No!

DREAMER: Taking a rest stop on the cosmic highway!

ME: No rest –

CRITIC: No rest?Sounds like your characters need better working conditions.

ARCHIVIST: Please be sure to log all character reassignments.

ME: I’m reverse outlining and rewriting in loops. Plot, character, theme, setting, subplot, then back around again. Everything in some sort of organized heap, then, adjusted until it works.

DREAMER: Have you considered a treasure map subplot? Or a phoenix? Or writing it in second person? Should only tack on what, 1-9 months to the process?

DRAGON: I’ve barely allowed you enough time to inhale, and you want to exhale treasure maps?

ARCHIVIST: I’ll need to research whether phoenixes and treasure maps can coexist in second person.

MARKETER: Forget all that. Pivot to a cookbook. Cookbooks sell.

MONKEY BRAIN: Iguanas!

ME: No treasure maps. No phoenixes. No second person. No cookbooks. No iguanas. No cookbooks for iguanas or (holds up a warning finger to MONKEY BRAIN) cookbooks about how to cook iguanas. I like my story and have committed to it.

DREAMER: Have you considered switching careers and becoming an organ grinder?

ME: Like in a play-the-barrel-organ way or in a Sweeney Todd way?

MONKEY BRAIN: I’m suddenly uncomfortable

CRITIC: You’re all deranged.

ME: Chair agrees.

DREAMER: [leaps to feet dramatically] I propose we devote the next month to exploring the concept of time as a sentient being.

CRITIC: Opposed. Hard no. Like, concrete-after-a-Chicago-winter hard no.

HYPE MAN: Also a no, but great idea! Imagine the tagline: What if time was alive? Boom! Bestseller! High five!

ARCHIVIST: Seconded, pending a trademark search for “sentient time.”

DRAGON: [snarls] Time is indeed sentient, and it hates you.

WORRIER: Motion for catastrophic preparedness: deadlines missed, mockery, general and specific humiliations. And typos.

HYPE MAN: Opposed! Fear is the mind-killer, baby!

MARKETER: I propose we conduct a comprehensive market analysis before finishing the draft. Demographics, comps, audience studies.

ME: Opposed!

CRITIC: Motion to stop overthinking.

WORRIER: Counter-motion to overthink harder.

HYPE MAN: Counter-counter-motion to stop thinking entirely.

ME: All right, team. The plan is simple: cooperation. If we can work together, we will finish this thing, and maybe even start other things. Right now we’re like a rickety cart pulled by twelve horses in different rodeos.

SELF-DOUBTER: This is delusional.

HYPE MAN: Delusional? This is destiny! Cooperation! Teamwork! No rickety carts!

DRAGON: I know I’m new here, but this sounds like a waste of time. Considering…(gestures at the group, chews a charcoal briquette, then belches).

ME: We’ll continue to work calmly, one voice at a time.

MONKEY BRAIN: (waves squished Tootsie Roll) Guess what this looks like! Guess! Wrong answer, it’s poo!

ME: Why do I bother?

CRITIC: That’s the real question, isn’t it?

HYPE MAN: Because you love it! Because this draft is fire! Because we’re unstoppable!

SELF-DOUBTER: Or because she doesn’t know how to quit.

ME: One of you has got to be right. All right, meeting adjourned. Spirit Halloween wants this space.